Time:2026-09-10 Browse: 0
September 2026 — Industrial Automation News
Schneider Electric has introduced a new generation of distributed control technology designed to change how industrial companies approach process automation and DCS modernization. The company recently announced its EcoStruxure Foxboro Software Defined Automation, an open and software-defined distributed control system designed for hybrid and continuous process industries.
The development is significant for the industrial automation market because traditional DCS platforms have historically depended heavily on dedicated hardware, proprietary engineering environments and vendor-specific architectures. The new approach places greater emphasis on software flexibility, interoperability, cybersecurity and the ability to modernize industrial control systems without replacing an entire plant infrastructure at once.
For manufacturers, chemical plants, energy facilities, water treatment operations and other process industries, this direction could become increasingly important as companies look for ways to combine existing PLC and DCS infrastructure with newer digital technologies.

Distributed control systems have traditionally been designed around long operating lifecycles. In many process industries, a DCS installation may remain in service for decades because reliability, availability and predictable operation are more important than rapid hardware changes.
However, industrial requirements are changing.
Modern plants are expected to support more data, connect with enterprise systems, integrate advanced analytics and respond more quickly to changing production requirements. At the same time, industrial companies face challenges related to aging equipment, cybersecurity, engineering resources and the availability of experienced automation specialists.
This creates a difficult situation for plant operators. Replacing a complete DCS can be expensive and disruptive, while continuing to operate an aging system can limit the ability to introduce new technologies.
Software-defined automation attempts to address this problem by separating automation software and control functions from traditional hardware dependencies.
Instead of designing the entire control architecture around a fixed group of proprietary controllers, the software-defined approach allows control applications to operate across more flexible computing environments.
This can give industrial users more options when planning modernization projects.
One of the most important concepts behind the new system is the separation between automation software and physical hardware.
In a traditional automation architecture, the controller, engineering software, I/O system and other components are often closely tied to a particular vendor ecosystem. Engineers become familiar with a specific hardware platform, and future upgrades generally need to remain compatible with that platform.
Software-defined automation changes this relationship.
Control applications can be designed to operate across different computing environments while maintaining the control functions required by the industrial process. This creates a more flexible architecture that can potentially evolve as computing technology changes.
For industrial companies, the benefit is not simply technological flexibility. It can also affect long-term asset management.
A plant may be able to introduce new computing hardware or software capabilities without completely redesigning the automation system. This approach can make modernization more incremental rather than requiring one large replacement project.
For facilities that operate continuously, this is particularly valuable because avoiding unnecessary production downtime can be just as important as improving the control system itself.
Another major focus of the new automation model is openness.
Industrial automation systems often contain equipment from multiple manufacturers. A production line may include PLCs, remote I/O, variable frequency drives, motion controllers, safety systems, HMIs, SCADA software, historians and industrial networks from different suppliers.
Integrating these systems has traditionally required significant engineering effort.
Open automation architectures are designed to make interoperability easier. Instead of forcing every component into a single proprietary ecosystem, open approaches aim to provide standardized interfaces and software environments that allow different technologies to work together.
This is especially important for large industrial facilities where existing automation equipment cannot simply be removed.
A modernization project may therefore involve a combination of legacy PLC systems, existing DCS infrastructure, new controllers, industrial PCs and edge computing devices.
An open architecture can provide a more practical path for combining these technologies.
The development is particularly relevant to companies working with both PLC and DCS technology.
Historically, PLCs have been strongly associated with discrete manufacturing and machine control, while DCS platforms have been associated with continuous process industries.
The distinction is becoming less rigid.
Modern industrial facilities increasingly combine continuous processes with discrete equipment, packaged machines, robotics, motion systems and intelligent field devices.
A process plant, for example, may use a DCS for overall process control while relying on PLCs for individual machines or packaged equipment. Data from these systems may then be connected to MES, ERP, cloud applications or analytics platforms.
This creates a growing need for automation architectures that can work across different control domains.
Software-defined automation is therefore not necessarily about replacing every PLC with a DCS or replacing every DCS with software. Instead, it represents a broader movement toward flexible control architectures where different automation technologies can coexist.
As industrial automation becomes increasingly connected, cybersecurity is becoming a central part of system design.
Traditional industrial control systems were often designed around relatively isolated operational environments. Modern systems, however, increasingly exchange information with corporate IT networks, remote monitoring platforms, cloud services and digital applications.
This connectivity creates new opportunities but also introduces additional risks.
A future-ready DCS therefore needs to consider cybersecurity from the beginning rather than treating security as an additional layer added after installation.
Software-defined automation can support this approach by incorporating secure architectures, controlled access, system monitoring and appropriate separation between operational technology and information technology.
For industrial operators, the objective is not simply to connect more equipment.
The goal is to create a connected automation environment without sacrificing reliability, availability or safety.
Artificial intelligence is another factor driving changes in industrial automation.
AI and machine learning applications require access to high-quality operational data. However, collecting data from a plant is only one part of the challenge. Companies also need to ensure that the data is connected to the actual production process and can be interpreted in the correct operational context.
A modern DCS can become an important bridge between physical production and digital applications.
Process variables, equipment conditions, alarms and production information can be made available for analytics and optimization while control functions continue to operate in real time.
This creates opportunities for predictive maintenance, process optimization, energy management and improved production planning.
The future of industrial AI will therefore depend not only on AI algorithms but also on the quality of the automation infrastructure supporting them.
For industrial companies planning automation upgrades, the movement toward software-defined DCS technology may provide a different way of thinking about modernization.
Instead of asking whether an entire DCS should be replaced, engineering teams can increasingly consider which parts of the architecture need to be modernized first.
A plant may start with control applications, then upgrade computing infrastructure, improve networking, introduce modern visualization or integrate new analytics.
This incremental approach can reduce disruption and allow companies to spread investment over time.
It can also help plants deal with legacy equipment that still performs reliably but is difficult to integrate with newer technologies.
The industrial automation industry is moving toward a model where flexibility is becoming almost as important as raw control performance.
Reliability will remain essential. Industrial processes cannot sacrifice stability simply to adopt new technology.
However, future automation systems also need to accommodate changing production requirements, new digital tools, cybersecurity requirements and increasingly complex industrial ecosystems.
Open software-defined DCS technology is one response to these challenges.
For PLC engineers, system integrators, automation distributors and industrial plant operators, the development is worth watching closely because it could influence how future control systems are designed and upgraded.
The most important change may not be the replacement of one controller with another. Instead, it may be the gradual transformation of industrial automation from hardware-centered infrastructure into a more flexible software-driven platform.
As factories and process plants become increasingly connected, automation systems will need to evolve continuously rather than remain unchanged for decades.
The next generation of DCS technology is therefore likely to focus on openness, interoperability, cybersecurity, real-time control and long-term adaptability.
For industrial companies preparing for the next stage of digital transformation, software-defined automation could become an important part of that transition.
Copyright © 2018-2025 Qunlebu Co., Ltd. All Rights Reserved. Excellent PLC GLB PLC MTS PLC